WP2 Curriculum Piloting Results (Oct–Nov 2025)
Curriculum Piloting Results
Between October and November 2025, the D’ARTIDE partner schools piloted the WP2 curriculum through classroom-based implementation and structured reflection activities.
The piloting phase tested how well the curriculum works in real school schedules, with diverse student groups, and across different educational settings—while also collecting feedback to improve the next iteration of materials and support tools.
Where piloting took place
Piloting was implemented in all four partner schools:
• Alviksskolan (Sweden)
• Școala Gimnazială “Horea” (Romania)
• Liceo Polivalente “Don Quirico Punzi” (Italy)
• Agrupamento de Escolas Augusto Cabrita (Portugal)
Participation at a glance
A total of 208 students participatedin piloting activities across the four countries, exceeding the minimum participation guideline (at least 30 students per school; at least 120 students in total).
Student participation by country:
• Sweden: 80 students (38.5% of total)
• Romania: 68 students (32.7%)
• Italy: 28 students (13.5%)
• Portugal: 32 students (15.4%)
In addition, evaluation evidence was collected through teacher and student feedback forms. At least 135 completed forms are explicitly documented in the submitted school reports (with additional questionnaires collected in Portugal via Microsoft Forms, though the exact number is not stated in the submitted report).
What students and teachers did during piloting
Across the four sites, piloting activities combined creative practice, collaboration, and digital literacy.
Students worked on artistic and media-based tasks that encouraged self-expression, teamwork, and critical engagement with digital content.
Examples of implementation included:
• Creative production (visual or digital creation, editing, and composition)
• Collaborative group work (shared decision-making, peer support, and problem-solving)
• Reflection on meaning and identity (interpretation of images, themes, perspectives)
• Digital responsibility (for example: fact-checking and awareness of digital footprint, where relevant to the chosen unit)
Key findings from the piloting phase
1) Strong overall satisfaction and engagement.
All four schools reported positive overall impressions of the piloting experience. Three partner schools rated the overall satisfaction level as “Good”, while Portugal rated it “Excellent”, highlighting the pedagogical and creative value of the activity and its fit with interdisciplinary teaching.
Portugal also reported that all participating teachers rated objectives and instructions as very clear (5/5), and described classroom engagement as high and collaborative, with strong openness to experimentation.
2) Creativity and self-expression were central outcomes
Across partner reports, students consistently highlighted creativity, artistic freedom, and the opportunity to experiment with digital tools. Italy noted recurring student descriptors such as “personal freedom,” “creativity,” “interesting,” and “useful.” Portugal reported that creativity and artistic freedom were among the most positive aspects identified by students.
3) Collaboration and peer support worked very well.
Collaboration emerged as a key strength. Italy explicitly emphasized peer collaboration and mutual support—especially for less confident students—while Portugal reported good teamwork and a collaborative classroom dynamic.
4) Digital literacy gains through hands-on practice.
All sites engaged students in applied digital tasks (for example: image editing, digital composition, creative use of tools). Teachers reported that using new tools in authentic classroom contexts supported digital confidence, exploration, and reflective skills such as observation, interpretation, and problem-solving.
5) Inclusion and participation.
Partner schools described the piloting as inclusive in practice, with broad participation and supportive learning environments. Italy reported that all students were able to participate, including those who were less confident, supported by both teachers and peers.
Challenges and improvement points
While feedback was clearly positive, piloting also produced concrete suggestions that will strengthen the next phase:
• More time for implementation was the most consistent recommendation, particularly in Portugal (to allow deeper artistic and technical development), and also reflected elsewhere as a general constraint.
• Clearer task segmentation and scaffolding was flagged in Sweden, especially when sessions are short.
• Curated resource support (for example: recommended links for fact-checking and better contextual fit of certain questions) was suggested in Romania.
• A mild learning curve with new digital tools was noted in Italy, indicating a need for quick onboarding support sheets.
What comes next
The WP2 piloting results provide a strong foundation for the next project steps.
The feedback confirms that the curriculum is usable across different contexts, supports creativity and collaboration, and can be successfully integrated into interdisciplinary school practice.
Based on what we learned, the next phases can build on three clear directions:
1. Strengthen scaffolding and timing guidance (especially for shorter school sessions)
2. Provide lightweight classroom supports (quick guides, curated resource packs, tool onboarding)
3. Carry the strongest elements forward—creative freedom, collaboration, inclusion, and digital practice—toward the project’s artistic and digital exhibition outputs
